Decision Matrix for In-House vs. Contracted Programs

In-House vs. Contracted Summer Camp Decision Matrix

Why it matters: Decide whether to manage programs internally or outsource them. This framework ensures decisions align with organizational mission, resources, and community needs.

Context:

Mission Alignment: Programs that directly support the organization’s mission and strategic goals are better suited for in-house management. Outsourcing should be considered if the contractor’s mission aligns with community needs.

Resource Availability: Evaluate staff, budget, facilities, and equipment. In-house management requires adequate resources, while contracting can alleviate constraints but must be cost-effective and maintain service quality.

Community Needs: Consider community preferences and demands through surveys and focus groups. Programs should cater to high-demand demographics and align with community interests.

Go deeper: The framework includes assessing operational efficiency, partnership opportunities, and flexibility. In-house management offers control over quality and scheduling but may increase administrative overhead. Contracting reduces this burden but needs careful oversight. Partnerships with local organizations can enhance program delivery, and maintaining flexibility allows for adapting to changing needs.‍

Who it’s for: This document is crucial for Parks and Recreation Directors, Program Managers, and Executive Directors. It provides a structured approach to making strategic decisions that maximize community impact and organizational effectiveness.

‍